🔗 Share this article

In my role as a Dungeon Master, I traditionally avoided extensive use of chance during my tabletop roleplaying sessions. My preference was for story direction and session development to be shaped by deliberate decisions rather than the roll of a die. Recently, I decided to alter my method, and I'm very glad I did.

The Inspiration: Seeing 'Luck Rolls'

A well-known podcast features a DM who often calls for "chance rolls" from the participants. The process entails selecting a polyhedral and assigning possible results tied to the number. This is fundamentally no different from using a random table, these are created on the spot when a course of events lacks a obvious conclusion.

I chose to experiment with this technique at my own game, mostly because it appeared engaging and offered a break from my standard routine. The outcome were remarkable, prompting me to think deeply about the often-debated balance between pre-determination and improvisation in a tabletop session.

An Emotional Session Moment

During one session, my players had just emerged from a massive battle. Later, a cleric character wondered if two key NPCs—a sibling duo—had made it. Instead of choosing an outcome, I asked for a roll. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. I defined the outcomes as: on a 1-4, both would perish; on a 5-9, a single one would die; a high roll, they survived.

The player rolled a 4. This resulted in a incredibly poignant moment where the party came upon the corpses of their companions, forever holding hands in their final moments. The cleric held last rites, which was particularly meaningful due to earlier character interactions. As a final touch, I improvised that the forms were miraculously restored, containing a enchanted item. By chance, the item's magical effect was precisely what the group lacked to resolve another pressing story problem. One just orchestrate these kinds of perfect moments.

Improving Your Improvisation

This event caused me to question if randomization and spontaneity are truly the beating heart of tabletop RPGs. While you are a prep-heavy DM, your skill to pivot can rust. Groups reliably find joy in upending the most carefully laid plots. Therefore, a effective DM needs to be able to think quickly and fabricate details on the fly.

Employing on-the-spot randomization is a excellent way to train these abilities without straying too much outside your preparation. The key is to apply them for minor situations that won't drastically alter the overarching story. For instance, I would avoid using it to establish if the king's advisor is a secret enemy. But, I might use it to decide whether the PCs enter a room just in time to see a critical event unfolds.

Strengthening Shared Narrative

This technique also works to keep players engaged and create the feeling that the story is responsive, shaping based on their decisions as they play. It combats the feeling that they are merely actors in a pre-written narrative, thereby enhancing the cooperative foundation of the game.

This philosophy has historically been part of the original design. Early editions were reliant on random tables, which fit a playstyle focused on treasure hunting. Even though modern D&D often emphasizes plot-driven play, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, it's not necessarily the only path.

Striking the Healthy Equilibrium

It is perfectly nothing wrong with doing your prep. However, equally valid nothing wrong with letting go and permitting the rolls to guide minor details in place of you. Direction is a big factor in a DM's role. We need it to manage the world, yet we frequently find it hard to give some up, even when doing so could be beneficial.

My final suggestion is this: Do not fear of relinquishing a bit of the reins. Experiment with a little randomness for inconsequential details. You might just create that the organic story beat is significantly more memorable than anything you would have scripted by yourself.