🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities is set to be cut by over 50%, following a divisive legislative amendment that forced local governments to put the future of hard-won Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which can include multiple elected officials based on demographic data, were established in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils were only able to create a Māori ward by first putting it to a community referendum in their area. Local populations frequently spent years building local support and pushing their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying local residents should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had created a electoral district under the previous policy to conduct binding referendums alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their seats, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – showing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties however have criticised the new policy as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it wants to terminate “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to create other types of wards – including countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation suggested the administration was singling out Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement referred to the 17 areas that voted to retain their wards.