🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently following viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content appear to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."