🔗 Share this article

A significant change is underway in European international assistance approach, experts warn. The longstanding emphasis on addressing global poverty and famine is increasingly being overtaken by geopolitical "games", while nations redirect funds toward Ukraine support and national defence spending.

New Announcements Highlight a Wider Trend

During late 2025, the Swedish government revealed a significant slashing of development assistance totaling 10bn Swedish kronor (£800m). The money once allocated to Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Liberia, Tanzania, and Bolivia projects will now be reallocated.

At the same time, Germany officials have presented a humanitarian budget for the year 2026 planned at €1.05bn (£920 million). This figure is less than half of the last year's funding, with spending shifted on crises seen as a direct priority for Europe.

"In my view we are losing a common agreement of solidarity and responsibility which has been in place for a while now," said one director based in the German capital.

The Expanding Roster of Donors Following Suit

The pattern is not isolated. Other major nations have implemented parallel decisions:

• United Kingdom earlier this year announced plans to reduce its total overseas aid budget to finance increased defense spending.
• The Norwegian government has raised its non-military support to the Ukrainian government by 2.5 billion kroner (£185m), which now constitutes a quarter of its entire assistance allocation. However, this boost has been partly funded by a reduction to assistance for Africans countries.
• France in its 2026 budget also scheduled a significant €700m reduction to its development aid budget, featuring a drastic sixty percent reduction in food assistance. At the same time, defense spending is set to rise by €6.7bn.

Aid Becoming Increasingly "Transactional"

Analysts suggest that humanitarian assistance is becoming seen through a strategic perspective. Support is increasingly allocated to where donor nations identify a direct benefit for their own security.

"It’s a broader geopolitical trend and there’s a dangerous idea by some actors that they have to engage in this strategy now in the same way as Moscow, Beijing, Washington," added the expert.

Dire Consequences for Developing Regions

The policy shifts have real-world and devastating impacts.

In Mozambique, a nation that is grappling with natural disasters, drought, and ongoing conflict in its Cabo Delgado region, aid cuts are currently having an effect. A nation has received only a fraction of the money required for this year, resulting in sporadic food distribution and healthcare gaps.

The Swedish funding withdrawal will directly hit programmes that deliver medical care, education, and reintegration services for civilians displaced by the violence.

Moreover, reductions to international health funding threaten years of advances in addressing HIV/Aids. Countries like Mozambican, Zimbabwean, and Tanzania are part of those expected to feel the worst impact of these withdrawals.

"Every cut compounds the danger of long-term developmental decline," said a country director for a prominent humanitarian organization in Mozambique. "Should current patterns continue, 2026 will be incredibly hard ... there is a genuine risk that progress made over the last decade could be lost."

The broader consensus is that communities most affected by these decisions have no influence in shaping them. Although funding capitals may address short-term political priorities, the long-term effect is the destabilization of on-the-ground networks that prevent humanitarian conditions from deteriorating further.