🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just the winner overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

It was necessary since they were adding around 200,000 votes into the system frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots added later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, where the opponent was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained half a million supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump previously backed the progressive this year. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I thought we might go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to get over half. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it because then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Including Tottenville in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many conservatives on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I think occurred significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents supported the independent. So there existed some opposition. But overall, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were strongly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if existed major surprises on this one, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that every city in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.